Common Method Variance Techniques
By Bradford R. Eichhorn. 2014
299 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2693d0aa990aa0b07b58f227f168e96349892746
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Sebastian Stoermer
- Sushant Kumar
- Samuel Davies
- Ziaul Haque Munim
- Misagh Tasavori
- Mi-Kyeng Jeong
- Arunima Shah
- Hyejo Shin
Citations in the corpus
- Market orientation, market disruptiveness capability and social enterprise performance: An empirical study from the United Kingdom (2019, methodology): “Then, following the method described in Eichhorn (2014), we included a common latent factor in CFA whose indicators included all the principal constructs’ indicators that we set to equal; also the variance of the common latent factor was constrained to be one in order for the model to be identified.”
- Revisiting food delivery apps during COVID-19 pandemic? Investigating the role of emotions (2021, methodology): “Lastly, the study utilized common latent factor technique (Eichhorn, 2014) and confirmatory factor analysis marker variable technique (MacKenzie and Podsakoff, 2012).”
- Students’ Psychological Perceptions Toward Online Learning Engagement and Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis of Students in Three Different Countries (2021, background): “Specifically, the variance explained by a single factor without any type of rotation was .37 (Eichhorn, 2014).”
- The influence of expatriate cultural intelligence on organizational embeddedness and knowledge sharing: The moderating effects of host country context (2020, background): “The results indicate that common method variance was not severely affecting our data, with the common variance estimate being Journal of International Business Studies clearly below common thresholds (Eichhorn, 2014).”
- Reward crowdfunding contribution as planned behaviour: An extended framework (2019, methodology): “Furthermore, to check for common method bias (Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee, & Podsakoff, 2003), we followed the analytical techniques examining Harman's single factor, common latent factor and a common marker variable, as well as their recommended threshold levels (Eichhorn, 2014).”