Memory interference during language processing.

By Peter C. Gordon, Randall Hendrick, Marcus R. Johnson. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 2001

605 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/26877f7f9c0e49a934b87bd6ece0b8282d8b977b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities (2003, background): “In particular, we have seen that the cue-based parser is hindered in contexts where there is a high amount of retrieval interference generated by structurally similar items in the existing parse ((Lewis, 1996), see also (Gordon et al., 2001)).”
Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. (2007, background): “Interference effects in sentence processing are beginning to be recognized, but the conditions that give rise to these effects are not well understood ( Gordon, Hendrick, & Johnson, 2001, 2004; Van Dyke & Lewis, 2003; Van Dyke & McElree, 2006).”
An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval (2005, background): “Interference sentence processing theories . Some recent approaches to sentence processing have emphasized the role of similarity-based interference (Lewis, 1993, 1996; Van Dyke & Lewis, 2003; Gordon, Hendrick, & Levine, 2002; Gordon et al., 2001 ).”
Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush (2006, methodology): “This is reminiscent of Gordon et al. (2001), who use a similarity-based account to explain why the processing difficulty of object relative clauses is reduced when the subject of this relative clause is a pronoun, as in (18).”
An ERP study of the processing of subject and object relative clauses in Japanese (2008, neutral): “Gordon, Hendrick, & Johnson, 2001; Warren & Gibson, 2002).”
Morphology, agreement and working memory retrieval in sentence production : Evidence from gender and case in Slovak (2007, background): “However, the coarseness of retrieval cues, the ambiguity of certain lexical representations, and the fact that representations in working memory decay over time can cause problems for memory retrieval operations (Gordon et al., 2001; Lewis & Vasishth, 2005), and may result either in the retrieval of”
Object relatives made easy: A cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children's processing of relative clauses (2007, background): “1 Gordon et al. (2001) argued that the difficulty ascribed to object relatives can be attributed”
Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence (2007, background): “Previously, Gordon et al. (2001) conducted a similar reading task experiment comparing the processing of object and subject relative clauses in which the indexical pronoun you was the embedded noun phrase.”
Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence (2013, methodology): “…process that degrades the memory fidelity of individual memory chunks when their representations overlap in feature content would predict similar patterns of difficulty, without requiring the use of non-structural cues to retrieval (Gordon et al., 2001, 2002, 2004; Nairne, 1988, 1990).”
Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity (2004, methodology): “Indexical pronouns (like ‘‘you’’ in example 4) are said not to introduce new discourse referents because the referent is implicit in the discourse environment, thereby causing the reduction in the doubly embedded structures (Bever, 1974) and the reduction in the object– subject difference with the p”
Online Syntactic Storage Costs in Sentence Comprehension. (2005, background): “One possible interpretation of these data is that there is interference at the site of thematic interpretation, the verb, when there is a similar verb just before it (cf., Gordon et al., 2001).”