The Effects of Information Disclosure and Board Independence on IPO Discount**

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

IPO Research in Management and Entrepreneurship: Moving the Agenda Forward (2009, background): “Maintaining a focus on investors, additional research relies on financial market measures to gauge the success of IPO firms in the years following the offering (e.g., Chahine & Filatotchev, 2008; Young & Zaima, 1988).”
Governance, ownership structure, and performance of IPO firms: The impact of different types of private equity investors and institutional environments (2009, methodology): “First we used a matched pairs methodology where both French and UK IPO samples are matched as closely as possible by size and age, which are usually used as control variables in the IPO literature (Chahine and Filatotchev, 2008).”
Strategic and institutional effects on foreign IPO performance : Examining the impact of country of origin, corporate governance, and host country effects (2012, background): “However, these proxies have been criticized for over-restrictive underlying assumptions (see Chahine and Filatotchev, 2008, for a discussion).”
Corporate Governance and Cash Holdings: Listed New Economy versus Old Economy Firms (2008, unknown): “First, board independence enhances the quality of information disclosure and reduces information asymmetry (Chahine and Filatotchev, 2008).”
Board Independence, Ownership Structure and the Valuation of IPOs in Continental Europe (2014, unknown): “Chahine and Filatotchev (2008) analyze 140 French IPOs from 1996 to 2000.”