A cost–benefit analysis of the Stockholm congestion charging system

292 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Optimal Distance Tolls under Congestion Pricing and Continuously Distributed Value of Time (2012, background): “…practices, Singapore in 1975 (Phang and Toh, 1997; Li, 1999) and Norwegian cities in the mid 1980s (Langmyhr, 2001), implementations of congestion pricing have been accelerated when it comes to the new century, for instance, London in 2003 (Santos, 2008) and Stockholm in 2006 (Eliasson, 2009).”
The Stockholm congestion charges – five years on. Effects, acceptability and lessons learnt (2012, methodology): “A detailed account of the political process can be found in (Gullberg & Isaksson 2009), and experiences from the design and evaluation processes are described in (Eliasson 2009b).”
Reducing Urban Road Transportation Externalities: Road Pricing in Theory and in Practice (2011, unknown): “As shown in Table 3, Eliasson (2009) presents a relatively comprehensive benefit–cost analysis of the trial, estimating the annual benefits net of operating costs to be SEK 654 million and the investment and startup costs to be SEK 1.”