A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than.

By Simon Dymond, D. Barnes. 1995

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

On the Binding Problem in Artificial Neural Networks (2020, methodology): “In a similar experiment, Dymond and Barnes (1995) showed that subjects were able to use such derived equivalence relations to “correctly” respond to stimuli for which no explicit feedback was provided.”
Establishing Relational Responding in Accordance with More-than and Less-than as Generalized Operant Behavior in Young Children (2004, methodology): “Specifically, some of these studies developed experimental procedures for demonstrating complex patterns of derived relational responding in human adult participants (e.g., Dymond & Barnes, 1995, 1996; Roche & Barnes, 1996, 1997; Roche, Barnes-Holmes, Smeets, Barnes-Holmes, & McGeady, 2000; Steele”
Relational Frame Theory: Some Implications for Understanding and Treating Human Psychopathology (2004, unknown): “It is likely thereafter that A will acquire an even greater reinforcing function, in the absence of explicit training, because of its participation in a more-than relation with B ( Dymond & Barnes, 1995; Roche & Barnes, 1997; Roche, Barnes-Holmes, Smeets, Barnes-Holmes & McGeady, 2000).”
Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. (2006, background): “…(the nickel and dime situation just mentioned) can be trained as an overarching operant in young children (Barnes-Holmes, Barnes-Holmes, Smeets, Strand, & Friman, 2004; Berens & Hayes, under submission); (2) cognition alters the effects of other behavioral processes (e.g., Dymond & Barnes, 1995).”
Relational Frame Theory: An Overview of the Controversy (2009, background): “…has revealed that the behavioral functions of a stimulus can also be changed or transformed based on its derived relation to other stimuli (Dougher, Hamilton, Fink, & Harrington, 2007; Dymond & Barnes, 1995; Roche & Barnes, 1997; Roche, BarnesHolmes, Smeets, Barnes-Holmes, &McGeady, 2000).”
Relational Frame Theory and Stimulus Equivalence: Conceptual and Procedural Issues (2004, methodology): “…consistency criterion was used to control for the effects of inadvertent feedback provided by repeated training and testing (see Barnes & Keenan, 1993, p. 63, for rationale), and had been used successfully in a number of previous studies (e.g., Dymond & Barnes, 1995; 1996; Roche & Barnes, 1996).”
Perspective-Taking and Theory of Mind: A Relational Frame Account. (2004, unknown): “…of the relational frames identified thus far, including, frames of coordination, comparison, opposition, and deictic frames of perspective-taking (Dymond & Barnes, 1995; McHugh, Barnes-Holmes, & Barnes-Holmes, in press; Roche, Barnes-Holmes, Smeets, Barnes-Holmes, & McGeady, 2000; Steele &…”