Relational Frame Theory: An Overview of the Controversy

By Amy C. Gross, E. Fox. 2009

77 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. J. Urgen Schmidhuber
2. Sjoerd van Steenkiste
3. Klaus Greff
4. D. Barnes-Holmes
5. Sean Hughes
6. Nigel Vahey
7. Sungjin Ahn
8. Faustino J. Gomez

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Sean Hughes
2. Nigel Vahey
3. D. Barnes-Holmes
4. J. Urgen Schmidhuber
5. Klaus Greff
6. Sjoerd van Steenkiste
7. Yvonne Barnes-Holmes

Citations in the corpus

• On the Binding Problem in Artificial Neural Networks (2020, background): “However, another reason may be due to the controversy that surrounds certain aspects of RFT, such as the clarity of the involved concepts and its novelty with regards to previous accounts of stimulus equivalence (Gross and Fox, 2009).”
• Holding on to our functional roots when exploring new intellectual islands: A voyage through implicit cognition research (2012, background): “…as a coherent, parsimonious and progressive functional theory that has gained empirical momentum and stimulated a rapidly growing body of research (see Dymond & Roche, in press), clinical applications (Gaudiano, 2011; Rehfeldt & Barnes-Holmes, 2009), and conceptual controversy (Gross & Fox, 2009).”