Contingent Valuation and Cultural Resources: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Literature

By Douglas S. Noonan. 2003

357 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/259c7ed23c1b048c4d6d3cd6dde53507598fd3bb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

Cultural bequest values for ecosystem service flows among indigenous fishers: A discrete choice experiment validated with mixed methods (2015, neutral): “Due to their flexibility, DCEs are perhaps themost appropriate available method for eliciting values in complex situations involving tradeoffs between multiple ecosystem services, particularly those linked to socio-cultural values (Adamowicz et al., 2008; Noonan, 2003; Rolfe et al., 2000).”
A meta-analysis of contingent valuation forest studies (2010, methodology): “Finally, and following previous meta-analyses such as Ojea and Loureiro (2009) and Loomis and White (1996), we included the publication year through the dummy variables period1 for publications before 1995, and period2 for publications between 1996 and 2002.”
Valuing cultural heritage in developing countries: comparing and pooling contingent valuation and choice modelling estimates (2007, background): “There are also very few valuation studies of cultural heritage goods worldwide; around 60 compared to many thousand environmental valuations studies (Navrud and Ready 2002; Noonan 2002, 2003; Pearce et al. 2002).”
Evaluating efficient public good provision: Theory and evidence from a generalised conditional efficiency model for public libraries (2011, background): “9 expected congestion increases (e.g., McConnell, 1977; Menz and Mullen, 1981; Ashworth and Johnson, 1996; for a review relating to cultural resources, see Noonan, 2003).”
Economic valuation of cultural heritage sites: A choice modeling approach (2010, methodology): “The application of CVM to cultural goods is a relatively recent phenomenon with a limited range of examples available in the published literature (Navrud & Ready, 2002: p. 257; Noonan, 2003: p. 161).”
Capturing the benefits of preserving cultural heritage (2008, background): “[2,8,10]), but in recent years the number of CM studies applied to cultural resources has increased (e.”
The total economic value of threatened, endangered and rare species: An updated meta-analysis (2009, background): “Mail surveys are expected to result in lower WTP than phone or in-person interviews (Noonan, 2003).”
Cultural Heritage: Economic Analysis and Public Policy (2006, methodology): “17 For overviews of the method and its application in the cultural heritage field, see Frey and Oberholzer-Gee (1998), Klamer and Zuidhof (1999), Navrud and Ready (2002) and Noonan (2003).”