Functional complementarity in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.
By R. Koide. 2000
168 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Insect Science, Pharmacology, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/25843b4c77d4339220f7ee184e03a6717be00cf5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Insect Science
- F. Andrew Smith
- Sarah E. Smith
- M. Scherer‐Lorenzen
- R. Ruh
- N. Mathimaran
- M. Giovannetti
- R. Murray
- M. Fischer
In Pharmacology
- F. Andrew Smith
- Sarah E. Smith
- J. Jansa
- I. Jakobsen
- E. Frossard
- Melanie D. Jones
- A. Mozafar
- S. Bedini
In Plant Science
- F. Andrew Smith
- Sarah E. Smith
- J. Jansa
- E. Frossard
- I. Jakobsen
- Melanie D. Jones
- A. Mozafar
- Elisa Pellegrino
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant growth depend on root system: a meta-analysis (2014, background): “AMF possibly perform complementary functioning of roots to explore more soil volume for nutrients (Koide 2000).”
- Global diversity and distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (2011, unknown): “…traits have occurred during the evolution of the Glomeromycota lineage, affecting the growth of the fungus and plant host (Hart and Reader, 2002; Koide, 2000; Maherali and Klironomos, 2007; Powell et al., 2009), For example, Hart and Reader (2002) demonstrated that members of the Gigasporaceae…”
- Nutrient transfer in arbuscular mycorrhizas: how are fungal and plant processes integrated? (2001, background): “investigation, and may have considerable implications for variations in symbiotic effectiveness in different plant/ fungus combinations (Koide 2000).”
- Impact of agricultural management on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in Kenyan ferralsol (2007, background): “…necessarily relate to the function but rather to sustainability of an agroecosystem (Sieverding, 1990), whereas others suggested that the greater the diversity, the more benefits will be conferred to the crops, because the mycorrhizal community will span broader range of functions (Koide, 2000).”
- Plant defence theory re‐examined: nonlinear expectations based on the costs and benefits of resource mutualisms (2011, background): “2006), which may access a greater range of nutrients than a single fungal species (Koide 2000; Jansa, Smith & Smith 2008).”
- Biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning in a 15-year grassland experiment: Patterns, mechanisms, and open questions (2017, result): “In line with those findings, Smith, Jakobsen, and Smith (2000) showed that different AMF species complement each other by acquiring P close to roots (Scutellospora calospora) and far from roots (Glomus caledonium), suggesting functional complementarity among AMF species, thereby increasing overall P”
- Mycorrhizal colonization impacts on phenolic content and antioxidant properties of artichoke leaves and flower heads two years after field transplant (2010, unknown): “The larger increases in TPC and ARP values obtained with the mixed inoculum, regardless of the origin of the extracts (leaves or flower heads) suggest a synergistic effect and may indicate a functional complementarity between G. intraradices and G. mosseae, as suggested by Koide (2000).”
- Field inoculation effectiveness of native and exotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a Mediterranean agricultural soil (2011, methodology): “alexandrinum reported here may be explained by a synergistic effect of the mixed inocula (Koide, 2000; Smith et al., 2000), due to the complementarities of biological traits among AM fungal isolates, such as the extent and structure of mycorrhizal networks (Jakobsen et al.”
- Enhancing ecosystem services in sustainable agriculture: Biofertilization and biofortification of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (2014, background): “Moreover, because 83 interactions among different AMF are not always synergistic (Koide, 2000; Jansa et al., 2008, 84 2009), AM fungal inocula have to be evaluated also in the field, where a local community is 85 present.”
- Exploring functional definitions of mycorrhizas: Are mycorrhizas always mutualisms? (2004, background): “Similarly, a combination of hyphal foraging strategies by AM fungi colonizing the same plant may increase the effectiveness of an AM root system to scavenge nutrients at different distances from the root (Koide 2000).”
- Differential host plant performance as a function of soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities: experimentally manipulating co-occurring Glomus species (2006, background): “The fact that G. etunicatum provides little benefit unless G. intraradices is also present could be a manifestation of niche partitioning in the fungi ( Koide 2000 ).”
- Roots of the Second Green Revolution (2007, background): “Genotypic variation in mycorrhizal responsiveness among crop genotypes is associated with reduced expression of root traits responsible for fine-scale foraging such as root hairs or fine branching, resulting in a functional compensation of mycorrhizal and root traits (Koide 2000).”
- Phosphorus Acquisition Strategies within Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Community of a Single Field Site (2005, background): “Although plant roots are often simultaneously colonized by several AMF species, functional consequences of this phenomenon remain largely unknown and speculative (Koide, 2000; Merryweather and Fitter, 1998).”
- Impact of tillage system on arbuscular mycorrhiza fungal communities in the soil under Mediterranean conditions (2012, background): “Arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (AMF) exhibit considerable functional diversity, at the inter- and intraspecific level (Koide, 2000; Munkvold et al., 2004).”