A global model of island biogeography
158 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/256b2a65c566176802e48993900af1c8e9790eeb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
- Miguel B. Araújo
- C. Rahbek
- Jens‐Christian Svenning
- Robert J. Whittaker
- Pedro Cardoso
- K. A. Triantis
- Hong Qian
- Antoine Guisan
In Ecology
- Robert J. Whittaker
- Miguel B. Araújo
- K. A. Triantis
- C. Rahbek
- Jens‐Christian Svenning
- L. Fahrig
- F. Guilhaumon
- E. Tjørve
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Miguel B. Araújo
- C. Rahbek
- Robert J. Whittaker
- Jens‐Christian Svenning
- P. Borges
- K. A. Triantis
- Pedro Cardoso
- Hong Qian
Citations in the corpus
- Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis (2013, background): “In contrast, in most patchy habitat situations (and some island situations: Kalmar & Currie, 2006; Weigelt & Kreft, 2013), immigration occurs predominantly from habitat within the neighbourhood of the patch, rather than from a common mainland area.”
- The island immaturity – speciation pulse model of island evolution: an alternative to the “diversity begets diversity” model (2007, background): “Accepted 19 February 2007 islands (MacArthur and Wilson 1967, Wright 1983, Wylie and Currie 1993, Kalmar and Currie 2006).”
- The island species–area relationship: biology and statistics (2012, background): “The explained variation in species richness can be increased by the inclusion into models of variables other than area, representing for example, habitat diversity, energy flow, system age or isolation (Kalmar & Currie, 2006; Whittaker et al., 2008).”
- Species richness and evolutionary speed: the influence of temperature, water and area (2014, background): “…gradient, the species–area relationship holds for both aquatic and terrestrial realms and for a broad range of taxa (e.g. Drakare et al., 2006; Kalmar & Currie, 2006; Kreft et al., 2008), and integrating area and productivity over geological time has been found to provide the best…”
- Environment–richness relationships for mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians at global and regional scales (2010, background): “These studies include global richness patterns of birds (Hawkins et al. 2003b; Davies et al. 2007; Kalmar and Currie 2006, 2007; Qian 2008), mammals (Hortal et al. 2008), amphibians (Buckley and Jetz 2007), and plants (Francis and Currie 2003; Kreft and Jetz 2007), among many others at continental…”
- Biogeographical modules and island roles: a comparison of Wallacea and the West Indies (2012, background): “We included only terrestrial breeding birds, excluding seabirds and non-breeding migratory species, as their distributions are highly affected by non-insular factors (Kalmar & Currie, 2006).”
- Drivers of diversity in Macaronesian spiders and the role of species extinctions (2010, background): “This rationale was followed by Kalmar & Currie (2006) and Kreft et al. (2008), who used mean annual temperature and total annual precipitation as two climatic variables that influence the richness of island birds and plants, respectively, at a worldwide scale (but see Whittaker, 2006).”
- Time, area and isolation: factors driving the diversification of Azorean arthropods (2009, unknown): “the possible collinearity between energy and isolation measures in Kalmar & Currie, 2006; mentioned by Whittaker, 2006).”
- Shapes and functions of species–area curves (II): a review of new models and parameterizations (2009, background): “…assessing the effect of two or more independent variables (transformed or not) on species numbers are also very common (e.g. Dodson, 1992; Adler & Lauenroth, 2003; Triantis et al., 2003; Adler et al., 2005; Storch et al., 2005; Kalmar & Currie, 2006, 2007; Ulrich, 2006; Evans et al., 2007).”
- Habitat heterogeneity overrides the species–area relationship (2008, background): “These findings suggest a dominant role for habitat heterogeneity and probably productivity (which may not always be reflected by area) in determining species richness (Kalmar & Currie, 2006).”