The island species–area relationship: biology and statistics
By K. A. Triantis, F. Guilhaumon, Robert J. Whittaker. 2012
399 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0fb2216b417aeb9f301ee3e2e8ac77ee44bd3104
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Robert J. Whittaker
- T. Matthews
- M. Benchimol
- H. Cottee‐Jones
- Joaquín Hortal
- L. Fahrig
- C. A. Peres
- Miguel B. Araújo
In Genetics
- T. Matthews
- L. Fahrig
- Robert J. Whittaker
- H. Cottee‐Jones
- Pedro Cardoso
- Miguel B. Araújo
- Joaquín Hortal
- J. Fernández-Palacios
Citations in the corpus
- Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis (2013, background): “Consistent with this idea, a comprehensive review of species–area relationships for sets of true islands showed that the species–area slopes for inland islands, such as those in lakes, are shallower than the species–area slopes for oceanic islands (Triantis et al., 2012).”
- A roadmap for island biology: 50 fundamental questions after 50 years of The Theory of Island Biogeography (2017, background): “…relationship [Q2] remains an important topic and in particular how these processes and patterns vary among different island contexts, including oceanic, continental-shelf, continental fragment and habitat islands (e.g. Triantis et al., 2012; Pati~no et al., 2014b; Matthews et al., 2016).”
- Habitat fragmentation and the species–area relationship: a focus on total species richness obscures the impact of habitat loss on habitat specialists (2014, methodology): “While the power model is the most frequently used ISAR model, it should not be assumed that it provides a better fit than competitor SAR models a priori (although for real islands, a recent synthetic analysis shows that it is the best performing model overall; Triantis et al., 2012).”
- Anthropogenic modulators of species–area relationships in Neotropical primates: a continental‐scale analysis of fragmented forest landscapes (2013, background): “In fact, SARs remain the most frequent approach in predicting biodiversity erosion in fragmented environments, despite outstanding uncertainties about the appropriateness of model fits (Lomolino, 2000; Tjorve, 2003, 2009; Triantis et al., 2012).”
- Quantifying and interpreting nestedness in habitat islands: a synthetic analysis of multiple datasets (2015, background): “The overall richness of a set of fragments in a disturbed landscape depends not only on the form of the island species–area relationship (ISAR; sensu Whittaker & Fernández-Palacios, 2007; Triantis et al., 2012) but also on the compositional overlap between fragments.”
- Island biogeography: patterns of marine shallow‐water organisms in the Atlantic Ocean (2015, background): “This supports findings from previous studies (Triantis et al., 2012).”
- Thresholds and the species–area relationship: a synthetic analysis of habitat island datasets (2014, methodology): “After each iteration the analyses were re-run to determine the effect of sample size on the results (following Triantis et al., 2012).”