Shapes and functions of species–area curves (II): a review of new models and parameterizations

By E. Tjørve. 2009

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d6b43aa9d374fd8aae252174accb33b1cc895f3a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. K. A. Triantis
2. C. A. Peres
3. Robert J. Whittaker
4. M. Benchimol
5. F. Guilhaumon
6. Miguel B. Araújo

In Ecology

1. M. Benchimol
2. Robert J. Whittaker
3. K. A. Triantis
4. C. A. Peres
5. F. Guilhaumon
6. T. Matthews
7. Alexander C. Lees
8. H. Cottee‐Jones

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. M. Benchimol
2. K. A. Triantis
3. F. Guilhaumon
4. Robert J. Whittaker
5. C. A. Peres
6. Alexander C. Lees
7. Miguel B. Araújo
8. Jos Barlow

Citations in the corpus

• Anthropogenic modulators of species–area relationships in Neotropical primates: a continental‐scale analysis of fragmented forest landscapes (2013, background): “In fact, SARs remain the most frequent approach in predicting biodiversity erosion in fragmented environments, despite outstanding uncertainties about the appropriateness of model fits (Lomolino, 2000; Tjorve, 2003, 2009; Triantis et al., 2012).”
• The island species–area relationship: biology and statistics (2012, methodology): “Tjørve (2009) noted ‘the choice of model will, therefore, depend ultimately on the specific purposes of the exercise’.”