Measuring Well-Being

By P. Cooke, T. Melchert, K. Connor. 2016

430 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Health, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/25664b9709a473e5d07312add1be42808e6ccf42

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Frank Martela
2. T. Clausen
3. M. F. Andersen
4. I. Madsen
5. T. Theorell
6. Kennon M. Sheldon
7. L. R. M. Pedersen

In Health

1. Frank Martela
2. Kennon M. Sheldon
3. M. Demir

In Social Psychology

1. Frank Martela
2. Cahit Erdem
3. T. Clausen
4. M. F. Andersen
5. I. Madsen
6. T. Theorell
7. Kennon M. Sheldon
8. Metin Kaya

Citations in the corpus

• Job autonomy and psychological well-being: A linear or a non-linear association? (2021, methodology): “Psychological well-being was measured with the five-item WHO5 scale (Bech et al., 2003).”
• Clarifying the Concept of Well-Being: Psychological Need Satisfaction as the Common Core Connecting Eudaimonic and Subjective Well-Being (2019, background): “Cooke, Melchert, and Connor (2016) reviewed five commonly used multielement instruments to measure EWB and discovered that not a single element could be found in common across all five of them.”
• Students’ Well-Being and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study (2021, background): “With the emergence of positive psychology, the last few decades have witnessed a rapid increase in research on students’ well-being (Cooke et  al., 2016).”