Passivity as a Design Tool for Group Coordination
By Murat Arcak. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2007
671 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Control and Systems Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/254d3c998c9778be2db4ee86d09cabac8bca2d66
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Qing Hui
- Guanrong Chen
- Wenwu Yu
- Francesco Bullo
- Dimos V. Dimarogonas
- Wassim M. Haddad
- Florian Dörfler
- Karl Henrik Johansson
Citations in the corpus
- A Survey on Aerial Swarm Robotics (2018, methodology): “The passivity of the input– output dynamics [67]–[69] is commonly used to analyze the stability of networked nonlinear systems that have both the Laplacian matrix [ L in (4)] and the nonlinear dynamical terms [e.g., convection terms of (3) or the Lagrangian form in (5)].”
- Synchronization in networks of identical linear systems (2008, background): “Assumptions A1 and A2 below lead to a timevarying extension of the results in [8] and [19] in the special case of linear systems.”
- Effects of Delay in Multi-Agent Consensus and Oscillator Synchronization (2010, neutral): “[ 6 ] A. Bemporad, M. Morari, V. Dua, and E. N. Pistikopoulos, “The ex-”
- LQR-based coupling gain for synchronization of linear systems (2008, background): “It has also been shown that passivity theory can be useful in studying stability provided that the interconnection is symmetric [3, 17, 20].”
- Conditions for Synchronizability in Arrays of Coupled Linear Systems (2008, background): “It has also been shown that passivity theory can be useful in studying stability provided that the coupling is symmetric [4, 19, 22].”
- On robust control algorithms for nonlinear network consensus protocols (2008, background): “In contrast to [11], which considers consensus protocols for nonlinear systems using set stability notions, [7, 8] and the present paper build on the results of [9, 10] and give semistable stabilization results for nonlinear network dynamical systems.”
- Adaptive motion coordination: Using relative velocity feedback to track a reference velocity (2009, methodology): “To achieve objectives B1 and B2, Arcak (2007) employs the feedback law”
- Event based agreement protocols for multi-agent networks (2013, neutral): “Numerous contributions have been given in the literature for multi-agent systems by research papers (Arcak, 2007; Cortés, 2008; Jadbabaie, Lin, & Morse, 2003; Lin, Broucke, & Francis, 2004; Moreau, 2005; Olfati-Saber & Murray, 2004; Tanner, Jadbabaie, & Pappas, 2007; Xiao & Wang, 2008) and monograph”
- Synchronization in complex networks of phase oscillators: A survey (2014, background): “In the case of linear or passive systems, state or output synchronization are well understood; see for example, Arcak (2007), Bürger, Zelazo, and Allgöwer (2013), Dörfler and Bullo (2011), Lunze (2012) and Wieland (2010).”
- Linear Time Average Consensus on Fixed Graphs and Implications for Decentralized Optimization and Multi-Agent Control (2014, positive): “Our assumptions are closest to some of the problems considered in [73, 44, 3] which studied more sophisticated variations of this setup.”
- Consensus of Multiagent Systems and Synchronization of Complex Networks: A Unified Viewpoint (2016, background): “Reference[1] proposed a passivity-based design framework to deal with the group coordination problem, where both fixed and time-varying communication structures were considered.”
- Distributed Event-Triggered Control for Multi-Agent Systems (2012, background): “Several results concerning multi-agent cooperative control have appeared in the recent literature involving agreement or consensus algorithms [20], [12],[23], formation control [5], [4], [8], [2] and distributed estimation [21],[25].”
- Synchronization of Networks of Nonidentical Euler-Lagrange Systems With Uncertain Parameters and Communication Delays (2011, background): “It may be argued that fully actuated systems are full-state linearizable, and the basic results of [13] would be applicable.”