Does Family Intervention Work for Delinquents? Results of a Meta-Analysis

By C. Dowden, D. A. Andrews. 2003

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/250008ac98923916145514843da2b61f6e91176d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. M. Prendergast
2. D. Podus
3. Lisa Greenwell
4. J. Roll
5. J. Finney

Citations in the corpus

• Validating the Principles of Effective Intervention: A Systematic Review of the Contributions of Meta-Analysis in the Field of Corrections (2009, unknown): “Two of the six meta-analyses (ie, Dowden & Andrews, 2000 ; Dowden, Antonowicz, & Andrews, 2003 ) produced results that did not clearly support the risk principle.”
• Reconstructing the Risk-Need-Responsivity model: A theoretical elaboration and evaluation (2007, unknown): “…more intensively, targeting criminogenic needs, and matching treatment to the particular features of offenders, such learning style and motivation, etc. (e.g., Andrews & Bonta, 2003; Andrews & Dowden, 2006; Dowden & Andrews, 2003; Lipsey, 1992; Losel, 1995; Lowenkamp, Latessa, & Holsinger, 2006).”
• Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. (2006, background): “Some meta-analyses have found that better quality studies that control for threats to internal validity and limit bias have smaller effect sizes than studies of lower quality [69,70].”