An Agritourism Systems Model: A Weberian Perspective
By N. McGehee. 2007
244 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24e65b77a316de707f146913ec6ff7db0af1805b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
- Hyungsuk Choo
- Bruno Antonio Pansera
- Salvatore Ammirato
- Antonio Violi
- Alberto Michele Felicetti
- Cinzia Raso
- M. Strzelecka
- Celina Strzelecka
Citations in the corpus
- Assessing the sustainability of agritourism in the US: a comparison between agritourism and other farm entrepreneurial ventures (2013, background): “…such as biological pest management (Choo & Jamal, 2009) and overall stewardship efforts such as the preservation of rural landscapes, natural habitats and natural resources (Butler, 1999; Carlsen et al., 2001; Choo & Jamal, 2009; Clarke, 1997; Lane, 1994; McGehee, 2007; Smit & Brklacich, 1989).”
- Social interactions and intentions to revisit for agritourism service encounters (2014, background): “Farm-based tourism has increasingly given farmers an opportunity to generate additional income (Knowd, 2006), to be an avenue for direct marketing to consumers (Sonnino, 2004; Tew & Barbieri, 2012; Veeck, Che, & Veeck, 2006) and as a way to counteract social and economic problemsdloss of income, inc”
- Agritourism and Sustainability: What We Can Learn from a Systematic Literature Review (2020, background): “Although it is not always able to general high profits, in many cases, agritourism generates enough revenue to enable farms to survive during periods of poor production [7,55].”
- Empowerment and resident support for tourism in rural Central and Eastern Europe (CEE): the case of Pomerania, Poland (2017, background): “They are in essence “motivated by more than the provision of economic needs” because they consider the congruity between the considered exchange and their prevailing values and beliefs (McGehee, 2007, p. 113).”