Facial width-to-height ratio in a Turkish population is not sexually dimorphic and is unrelated to aggressive behavior
By Barış Özener. 2012
124 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24da52d4b9d69cf67cbe201b54251e60da80ff78
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Anthony C. Little
- Gary J. Lewis
- David I. Perrett
- Carmen E. Lefevre
- Timothy C. Bates
- L. Penke
- M. Back
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Anthony C. Little
- Gary J. Lewis
- Carmen E. Lefevre
- David I. Perrett
- Timothy C. Bates
- L. Penke
- David Feinberg
- B. Jones
Citations in the corpus
- Facial width-to-height ratio predicts achievement drive in US presidents (2012, background): “Fourteen Presidents could not be analysed because either no adequate frontal photograph was available (ruling out several early presidents) or had not been rated by Simonton (1986), whose data extended only as far as the presidency of Ronald Reagan.”
- In the face of dominance: Self-perceived and other-perceived dominance are positively associated with facial-width-to-height ratio in men (2014, background): “, 2012; Özener, 2011) and that it is not related to aggression (Deaner, Goetz, Shattuck, & Schnotala, 2012; Gómez-Valdés et al., 2013; Özener, 2011).”
- Telling facial metrics: facial width is associated with testosterone levels in men (2013, background): “Firstly, while recent findings show no sex difference in fWHR (Lefevre et al., 2012; Özener, 2012), there are”