Facial width-to-height ratio predicts achievement drive in US presidents

By Gary J. Lewis, Carmen E. Lefevre, Timothy C. Bates. 2012

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/beb57a593d88efbefe13e56e54c16dc24734fcaa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Anthony C. Little
2. Ian J. Deary
3. David I. Perrett
4. Carmen E. Lefevre
5. Gary J. Lewis
6. Timothy C. Bates

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Anthony C. Little
2. Gary J. Lewis
3. Carmen E. Lefevre
4. Timothy C. Bates
5. Ian J. Deary
6. David I. Perrett
7. ChrisD . Frith
8. Uta Frith

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Anthony C. Little
2. Carmen E. Lefevre
3. Gary J. Lewis
4. David I. Perrett
5. Timothy C. Bates
6. Ian J. Deary
7. David Feinberg
8. B. Jones

Citations in the corpus

• In the face of dominance: Self-perceived and other-perceived dominance are positively associated with facial-width-to-height ratio in men (2014, background): “If certain behavioural qualities which signal dominance, such as achievement drive (Lewis et al., 2012), aggression (Carré & McCormick, 2008; Carré et al.”
• No evidence for sexual dimorphism of facial width-to-height ratio in four large adult samples (2012, background): “This, then, might explain why fWHR is related to behavioural traits in men (e.g. Carre & McCormick, 2008; Haselhuhn & Wong, 2012; Lewis et al., 2012; Carre et al., 2009; Stirrat & Perrett, 2010; Stirrat & Perrett, in press) but apparently not in women (Haselhuhn & Wong, 2012).”