A preconditioned Navier–Stokes method for two-phase flows with application to cavitation prediction

By R. Kunz, D. Boger, D. R. Stinebring, T. Chyczewski, J. Lindau, H. Gibeling, S. Venkateswaran, T. Govindan. 2000

809 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24d6f14572330a4af57aee9d9cadc812675bb2cb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Mathematics

In Computational Mechanics

Citations in the corpus

Friction Drag Reduction of External Flows with Bubble and Gas Injection (2010, methodology): “These methods have been used to successfully compute a variety of canonical and practical, three-dimensional, unsteady, cavitating flows (Kunz et al. 2000, 2001; Lindau et al. 2002).”
Performance Analysis of Cavitating Flow in Centrifugal Pumps Using Multiphase CFD (2002, methodology): “3 Copyright © 2001 by ASME ter β, which provide favorable convergence characteristics for steady state and transient computations, as discussed in [ 7 ].”
Numerical simulation of cavitating flows with homogeneous models (2009, methodology): “Different preconditioned compressible solvers have been used to simulate cavitating flows in water or cryogenic fluids [1,10,13,23,42,46].”
Numerical analysis of unsteady cavitating turbulent flow and shedding horse-shoe vortex structure around a twisted hydrofoil (2013, background): “…two-dimensional cases (Coutier-Delgosha et al., 2003; Goncalves, 2011; Gopalan and Katz, 2000; Huang and Wang, 2011; Kawanami et al., 1997; Kjeldsen et al., 2000; Kunz et al., 2000; Laberteaux and Ceccio, 2001a; Le et al., 1993; Pham et al., 1999; Senocak and Shyy, 2004b; Stutz and Reboud, 1997).”
Combined Experimental and Computational Investigation of Unsteady Structure of Sheet/Cloud Cavitation (2013, background): “Most numerical models of cavitating flow assume the fluid to be homogeneous and isothermal, and apply either a barotropic equation of state [14,15] or a transport equation [16–20] to solve for the variation of the mixture density in the multiphase flow.”
Interfacial dynamics‐based modelling of turbulent cavitating flows, Part‐1: Model development and steady‐state computations (2004, methodology): “The interface is captured more sharply with the new interfacial dynamics model, Model-2 [ 5 ] and Model-3 [23] than with Model-1 [3, 22], especially in the downstream region of the cavity.”
Isentropic one-fluid modelling of unsteady cavitating flow (2004, background): “Thus, additional numerical techniques are usually required to overcome such difficulties [16,25].”
Analysis of cavitating flow structure by experimental and numerical investigations (2007, methodology): “(2.14) This expression is the classical one used as the local mass equation for the vapour phase in a cavitating flow (Merkle et al. 1998; Reboud et al. 1998; Kunz et al. 2000).”
Large Eddy Simulation of the transition from sheet to cloud cavitation over a wedge (2016, background): “Laberteaux and Ceccio (2001) further classiﬁed cavities as open and closed based on the absence and presence of re-entering jet respectively.”