Interfacial dynamics‐based modelling of turbulent cavitating flows, Part‐1: Model development and steady‐state computations

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Analysis of cavitating flow structure by experimental and numerical investigations (2007, background): “…of the Rayleigh–Plesset equation (Kubota et al. 1992; Singhal et al. 2002) or express the mass transfers between liquid and vapour in terms of the local inequality between the pressure and the vapour pressure (Reboud & Stutz 1995; Merkle, Feng & Buelow 1998; Kunz et al. 2000; Senocak & Shyy 2004a).”
Numerical analysis of unsteady cavitating turbulent flow and shedding horse-shoe vortex structure around a twisted hydrofoil (2013, methodology): “According to previous study by present author (Ji, 2011) and other researcher’s work (Senocak and Shyy, 2004a), the maximum density ratio between the liquid and the vapor, q l / q v ,clip , can inﬂuence the compressibility characteristics in the cavitation area and the mass transfer be-tween the…”
Large Eddy Simulation of the transition from sheet to cloud cavitation over a wedge (2016, methodology): “…homogeneous mixture assumption to study cavitation over two–dimensional geometries (e.g. Singhal et al., 2002; Coutier-Delgosha et al., 2007; Seo and Lele, 2009; Goncalves and Patella, 20 09; Kim, 20 09 ), and three-dimensional geometries with variation in the span and sidewalls (e.g. Saito et…”