Only One Tree from Each Seed? Environmental Effectiveness and Poverty Alleviation in Mexico's Payments for Ecosystem Services Program

223 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Parks versus PES: Evaluating direct and incentive-based land conservation in Mexico (2017, unknown): “Prior studies suggest small but positive poverty reduction in Mexico (Alix-Garcia et al. 2015) and small or neutral livelihood impacts in Costa Rica (Robalino et al. 2014, Arriagada et al. 2015).”
The Devil in the Detail: A Practical Guide on Designing Payments for Environmental Services (2016, background): “In practice, there are often tradeoffs in PES design between the two objectives of environmental effectiveness and poverty alleviation (Alix-Garcia et al., 2015; Bulte et al., 2008; Pagiola et al., 2005).”
The Different Dimensions of Livelihood Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) Schemes: A Systematic Review (2018, background): “Food Security Three counterfactual studies (Clements and Milner-Gulland, 2015; Alix-Garcia et al., 2015; Kwayu et al., 2017) and two non-counterfactual studies (Naidoo et al.”