Institutional approaches for carbon financing in the forest sector: learning lessons for REDD+ from forest carbon projects in Uganda

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services (2012, background): “Several studies reveal that PES – including emerging carbon and REDD+ pilot projects – enhance inequalities in income and access to resources, particularly when pro-poor management measures are not adopted [58 ,72,73], as well as create economic enclosures through territorialization for biodiversity”
Incentives, conditionality and collective action in payment for environmental services (2014, background): “Many REDD+ pilot initiatives operate with community groups (e.g. Harvey et al. 2010; Hajek et al. 2011; Peskett et al. 2011).”
Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries (2013, background): “The South African Working for Water Program (WfW) was established as a governmental program in 1995 and is run as a public poverty relief work program.”
Examining equity: a multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services (2013, unknown): “While ecosystem service agreements ostensibly aim to secure ecosystem services for future generations of ecosystem service ‘buyers’, they can also tie future generations of ‘sellers’ or service providers into long term constraints on resource use that span decades or longer (Peskett et al., 2011a).”