Development of Scientific Reasoning in College Biology: Do Two Levels of General Hypothesis-Testing Skills Exist?.

By Anton E. Lawson, B. C. Clark, Erin Cramer-Meldrum, K. Falconer, Jeffrey M. Sequist, Yong-Ju Kwon. 2000

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24a41bd4176f7b400a8ea3df0247750307a1d805

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Anton E. Lawson
2. Jonathan Osborne
3. Christine Chin
4. Alice A. Black

In Education

1. Anton E. Lawson
2. Jonathan Osborne
3. Christine Chin
4. Alice A. Black

In Social Psychology

1. Anton E. Lawson

Citations in the corpus

• The nature and development of hypothetico‐predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching (2003, background): “Thus, students lacking facility with stage 5 reasoning skills should have difficulty undergoing conceptual change and rejecting scientific misconceptions such as special creation (for example, Lawson and Weser 1990, Lawson and Worsnop 1992, Lawson et al. 1993, Lawson et al. 2000a,b).”