Combining high-dispersion spectroscopy with high contrast imaging : Probing rocky planets around our nearest neighbors

By I. Snellen, Remco J. de Kok, J. Birkby, B. Brandl, M. Brogi, C. Keller, M. Kenworthy, H. Schwarz, R. Stuik. 2015

226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Context. Ground-based high-dispersion (R 100,000) spectroscopy (HDS) is proving to be a powerful technique with which to characterize extrasolar planets. The planet signal is distilled from the bright starlight, combining spectral and time-di erential filtering techniques. In parallel, high-contrast imaging (HCI) is developing rapidly, aimed at spatially separating the planet from the star. While HDS is limited by the overwhelming noise from the host star, HCI is limited by residual quasi-static speckles. Both techniques currently reach planet-star contrast limits down to 10 5 , albeit for very di erent types of planetary systems. Aims. In this work, we discuss a way to combine HDS and HCI (HDS+HCI). For a planet located at a resolvable angular distance from its host star, the starlight can be reduced up to several orders of magnitude using adaptive optics and/or coronography. In addition, the remaining starlight can be filtered out using high-dispersion spectroscopy, utilizing the significantly di erent (or Doppler shifted) high-dispersion spectra of the planet and star. In this way, HDS+HCI can in principle reach contrast limits of 10 5 10 5 , although in practice this will be limited by photon noise and/or sky-background. In contrast to current direct imaging techniques, such as Angular Di erential Imaging and Spectral Di erential Imaging, it will work well at small working angles and is much less sensitive to speckle noise. For the discovery of previously unknown planets HDS+HCI requires a high-contrast adaptive optics system combined with a high-dispersion R 100,000 integral field spectrograph (IFS). This combination currently does not exist, but is planned for the European Extremely Large Telescope. Methods. We present simulations of HDS+HCI observations with the E-ELT, both probing thermal emission from a planet at infrared wavelengths, and starlight reflected o a planet atmosphere at optical wavelengths. For the infrared simulations we use the baseline parameters of the E-ELT and METIS instrument, with the latter combining extreme adaptive optics with an R=100,000 IFS. We include realistic models of the adaptive optics performance and atmospheric transmission and emission. For the optical simulation we also assume R=100,000 IFS with adaptive optics capabilities at the E-ELT. Results. One night of HDS+HCI observations with the E-ELT at 4.8 m ( = 0:07 m) can detect a planet orbiting Cen A with a radius of R=1.5 Rearth and a twin-Earth thermal spectrum of Teq=300 K at a signal-to-noise (S/N) of 5. In the optical, with a Strehl ratio performance of 0.3, reflected light from an Earth-size planet in the habitable zone of Proxima Centauri can be detected at a S/N of 10 in the same time frame. Recently, first HDS+HCI observations have shown the potential of this technique by determining the spin-rotation of the young massive exoplanet Pictoris b. Conclusions. The exploration of the planetary systems of our neighbor stars is of great scientific and philosophical value. The HDS+HCI technique has the potential to detect and characterize temperate rocky planets in their habitable zones. Exoplanet scientists should not shy away from claiming a significant fraction of the future ELTs to make such observations possible.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/249f33a8f0ee8411c480ef6177c8bc3312066cbd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. N. Madhusudhan
  2. Nuno C. Santos
  3. S. Udry
  4. B. Bowler
  5. X. Delfosse
  6. C. Lovis
  7. F. Selsis
  8. F. Pepe

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. N. Madhusudhan
  2. B. Bowler
  3. S. Udry
  4. Nuno C. Santos
  5. F. Pepe
  6. C. Lovis
  7. I. Snellen
  8. T. Robinson

In Instrumentation

  1. N. Madhusudhan
  2. Nuno C. Santos
  3. S. Udry
  4. B. Bowler
  5. I. Snellen
  6. C. Lovis
  7. F. Pepe
  8. J. Lustig-Yaeger

Citations in the corpus