Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Review of Remotely Detectable Signs of Life

By E. Schwieterman, N. Kiang, M. N. Parenteau, C. Harman, S. DasSarma, Theresa Fisher, Giada N. Arney, H. Hartnett, C. Reinhard, S. Olson and 8 more. Astrobiology, 2017

478 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In the coming years and decades, advanced space- and ground-based observatories will allow an unprecedented opportunity to probe the atmospheres and surfaces of potentially habitable exoplanets for signatures of life. Life on Earth, through its gaseous products and reflectance and scattering properties, has left its fingerprint on the spectrum of our planet. Aided by the universality of the laws of physics and chemistry, we turn to Earth's biosphere, both in the present and through geologic time, for analog signatures that will aid in the search for life elsewhere. Considering the insights gained from modern and ancient Earth, and the broader array of hypothetical exoplanet possibilities, we have compiled a comprehensive overview of our current understanding of potential exoplanet biosignatures, including gaseous, surface, and temporal biosignatures. We additionally survey biogenic spectral features that are well known in the specialist literature but have not yet been robustly vetted in the context of exoplanet biosignatures. We briefly review advances in assessing biosignature plausibility, including novel methods for determining chemical disequilibrium from remotely obtainable data and assessment tools for determining the minimum biomass required to maintain short-lived biogenic gases as atmospheric signatures. We focus particularly on advances made since the seminal review by Des Marais et al. The purpose of this work is not to propose new biosignature strategies, a goal left to companion articles in this series, but to review the current literature, draw meaningful connections between seemingly disparate areas, and clear the way for a path forward. Key Words: Exoplanets—Biosignatures—Habitability markers—Photosynthesis—Planetary surfaces—Atmospheres—Spectroscopy—Cryptic biospheres—False positives. Astrobiology 18, 663–708. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. Requirements for life 1.2. Exoplanet biosignature definitions 1.3. Biosignature categories 2. Evaluating Planetary Habitability 3. Overview of Terrestrial Exoplanet Modeling Studies 3.1. Observations of earth 3.2. Spectral models 3.3. Photochemical studies of terrestrial atmospheres 3.4. Earth through time 4. Gaseous Biosignatures 4.1. Gaseous biosignature overview 4.2. Earth-like atmospheres 4.2.1. Oxygen (O2) 4.2.2. Ozone (O3) 4.2.3. Methane (CH4) 4.2.4. Nitrous oxide (N2O) 4.2.5. Sulfur gases (DMS, DMDS, CH3SH) and relation to detectable C2H6 4.2.6. Methyl chloride (CH3Cl) 4.2.7. Haze as a biosignature 4.2.8. Other gases 4.3. “False positives” for biotic O2/O3 and possible spectral discriminators 4.4. Biosignatures in other types of atmospheres 4.5. Effects of the host star spectrum on photochemistry 4.6. Impacts of flares and particle events on biosignature gases 5. Surface Biosignatures 5.1. Photosynthesis 5.1.1. Principles of photosynthesis 5.1.1.1. Relationship between band gap wavelength and reductant in the generation of biogenic gases and pigment color 5.1.1.2. Uniqueness of OP 5.1.2. Photosynthetic pigments and the color of phototrophs 5.1.2.1. Structure 5.1.2.2. Light absorption 5.1.3. The vegetation “red edge” 5.1.4. Speculation about photosynthesis and pigment signatures on exoplanets 5.2. Retinal pigments 5.3. Alternative surface biosignatures: nonphotosynthetic pigments and reflectance features 5.4. False positive surface biosignatures 5.5. Chiral and polarization biosignatures 5.6. Fluorescence and bioluminescence 6. Temporal Biosignatures 6.1. Oscillations of atmospheric gases 6.2. Oscillations in surface signatures 7. Assessing Biosignature Plausibility 7.1. Chemical disequilibrium 7.2. Biomass estimation 7.3. Applications of network theory to biosignatures 8. Cryptic Biospheres: “False Negatives” for Life? 9. Prospects for Detecting Exoplanet Biosignatures 10. Summary

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e7008eb859965f22dcaaf8662e10d1b74423da7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

In Instrumentation

Citations in the corpus

Evolved Climates and Observational Discriminants for the TRAPPIST-1 Planetary System (2018, background): “…to undertake the first spectroscopic search for atmospheric water vapor and biosignature gases, such as O2 and CH4 (Des Marais et al. 2002; Rodler & López-Morales 2014; Catling et al. 2018; Fujii et al. 2018; Meadows 2017; Meadows et al. 2018b; Schwieterman et al. 2018; Walker et al. 2018).”
The Detectability and Characterization of the TRAPPIST-1 Exoplanet Atmospheres with JWST (2019, background): “Finally, a deeper dive to search for signs of habitability, including the presence of an ocean (see Lustig-Yaeger et al. 2018; Robinson 2018) and biosignatures (see Schwieterman et al. 2018), may be warranted for planets whose initial characterization does not preclude habitable conditions.”
Exoplanetary Atmospheres: Key Insights, Challenges, and Prospects (2019, background): “Initial studies show that the possible space of biochemical byproducts may comprise of numerous chemical species (226, 228), and may indeed be non-denumerably infinite.”