Effective Population Size and Genetic Conservation Criteria for Bull Trout

By B. Rieman, F. Allendorf. 2001

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2460415a8aaacd118f00d625e14158ef911ae009

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

1. M. Young
2. K. Fausch
3. J. B. Dunham
4. K. Shanker
5. B. Rieman
6. N. Ryman
7. L. Laikre
8. Patricia L. M. Lee

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. M. Young
2. J. B. Dunham
3. B. Rieman
4. K. Fausch
5. K. Morita
6. S. H. Morita
7. S. Yamamoto
8. K. Shanker

Citations in the corpus

• Effects of habitat fragmentation by damming on salmonid fishes: lessons from white-spotted charr in Japan (2009, background): “Rieman and Allendorf 2001; Kendall and Fox 2002; Vincenzi et al. 2008).”
• Effective population size and temporal genetic change in stream resident brown trout (Salmo trutta, L.) (2003, background): “tionary biology is presently focused on the ratio Ne/N, where N represents the ‘total’ population size (e.g., Frankham 1995; Vucetich and Waite 1998; Rieman and Allendorf 2001; Kalinowski and Waples 2002).”
• Marine turtles and IUCN Red Listing: A review of the process, the pitfalls, and novel assessment approaches (2008, background): “Criteria aimed at determining effective population size and conserving genetic diversity have been developed for fish (Reiman and Allendorf, 2001) and could also be adopted for marine turtles.”
• Strategies for conserving native salmonid populations at risk from nonnative fish invasions: tradeoffs in using barriers to upstream movement (2006, methodology): “Genetics: Isolation of small populations can cause loss of genetic diversity and random genetic drift (Rieman and Allendorf 2001).”
• Assessment of Alternative Harvest Regulations for Sustaining Recreational Fisheries: Model Development and Application to Bull Trout (2003, background): “This is based on a minimum sustainable population (minimum viable population [MVP]) that is approximately 6% of the unfished equilibrium population (given our baseline parameter set) and a population size generally considered to be viable from a genetic standpoint ( Allendorf and Leary 1986 ; Lande”