Marine turtles and IUCN Red Listing: A review of the process, the pitfalls, and novel assessment approaches

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Migratory corridors and foraging hotspots: critical habitats identified for Mediterranean green turtles (2015, methodology): “Use of pelagic corridors has been observed previously in green turtles in the South Atlantic (Luschi et al., 1998), and in leatherback turtles in the Atlantic (Fossette et al., 2014) and Pacific (Eckert & Sarti, 1997; Shillinger et al., 2008).”
Global Conservation Priorities for Marine Turtles (2011, methodology): “sharks [4], marine turtles [5,6], marine mammals [7]).”
A potential tool to mitigate the impacts of climate change to the caribbean leatherback sea turtle (2012, background): “Leatherbacks are thus listed as ‘Critically Endangered’ by the World Conservation Union (IUCN 2008, Seminoff & Shanker, 2008).”
Regional Management Units for Marine Turtles: A Novel Framework for Prioritizing Conservation and Research across Multiple Scales (2010, methodology): “A survey of MTSG members from 23 countries revealed that nearly 90% of respondents believed that regional assessments should use either ‘new MTSG criteria’ or ‘flexible, non-standardized criteria’ [48].”