Error Analysis: Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition

By J. Richards. 2015

489 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2449eaa9523d6cfeea0670c6920122d700f06a25

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. E. Marsden
2. Luke Plonsky
3. Dustin Crowther
4. S. Gass
5. Patti Spinner
6. Rattaneekorn Pochakorn
7. Jiraporn Liamnimitr
8. Kanyakorn Sermsook

Citations in the corpus

• An Analysis of Errors in Written English Sentences: A Case Study of Thai EFL Students. (2017, background): “Later, Runkati (2013) and Rattanadilok Na Phuket and Othman (2015) propose the two sources causing errors which are interlingual interference and intralingual interference.”
• A methodological synthesis and meta-analysis of judgment tasks in second language research (2020, background): “This notion was furthered by Selinker (1974), who noted that ‘the only observable data from meaningful performance situations we can establish as relevant … are … IL [interlanguage] utterances produced by the learner’ (p. 35).”