An Investigation of Positive and Negative Contact As Predictors of Intergroup Attitudes in the United States, Hong Kong, and Thailand
By Pirathat Techakesari, F. Barlow, Matthew J. Hornsey, Billy Sung, Michael Thai, J. Chak. 2015
96 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/241084fbc54125d56d4b2cc855c2a6572730b0c5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
In Social Psychology
- Linda R. Tropp
- Oliver Christ
- F. Barlow
- Pirathat Techakesari
- H. Selvanathan
- Mathijs Kros
- T. Pettigrew
- Miles Hewstone
In Sociology and Political Science
- Linda R. Tropp
- Oliver Christ
- F. Barlow
- Pirathat Techakesari
- H. Selvanathan
- Mathijs Kros
- Mathias Kauff
- Miles Hewstone
Citations in the corpus
- Whites for racial justice: How contact with Black Americans predicts support for collective action among White Americans (2018, background): “Although negative contact tends to be less frequent than positive contact (Graf, Paolini, & Rubin, 2014), negative contact has the potential to contribute to more negative intergroup outcomes (Barlow et al., 2012; Techakesari et al., 2015).”
- Does negative contact undermine attempts to improve intergroup relations? Deepening the understanding of negative contact and its consequences for intergroup contact research and interventions (2021, background): “In several samples there is even no significant correlation between positive and negative contact at all (e.g., Aberson, 2015; Hayward et al., 2017; Study 1; Reimer et al., 2017, Study 1b; Techakesari et al., 2015, Study 2 and Study 3).”