Contesting the market-based nature of Mexico’s national payments for ecosystem services programs: Four sites of articulation and hybridization

By Elizabeth Shapiro‐Garza. 2013

185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b545a61d29742abd6ab02961f1720275138675a6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The PES Conceit: Revisiting the Relationship between Payments for Environmental Services and Neoliberal Conservation (2017, background): “Mexico (McAfee and Shapiro 2010; Shapiro-Garza 2013), and Vietnam (McElwee 2012), contained little if any actualmarket exchange, instead”
Arrested Development? The Promises and Paradoxes of “Selling Nature to Save It” (2016, background): “…not only encompass but require substantial public funding, command-and-control legislation, and other elements seemingly anathema to “truly” market-oriented approaches (see Fletcher [2014] for review; see also Fletcher and Breitling 2012; McAfee 2012a; Milne and Adams 2012; Shapiro-Garza 2013).”
Evaluating the outcomes of payments for ecosystem services programmes using a capital asset framework (2014, background): “Other challenges include potential misapplication of MBIs (Lockie, 2013); the propensity to commoditize nature (Kosoy and Corbera, 2010), which could lead to reductions in ecological complexity and a ‘commodity fiction’ (Gomez-Baggethun and Ruíz-Perez, 2011; Muradian and Rival, 2012; Robertson, 2012”
Notions of Justice in Payments for Ecosystem Services:Insights from China’s Sloping Land Conversion Program in Yunnan Province (2015, background): “In addition, the designers and implementers of such schemes need to consider the notions of distributive justice held by the actors involved, just as they have been encouraged to consider how PES schemes fit the existing values that people attribute to ecosystems (Vatn, 2010; Shapiro-Garza, 2013).”
What factors influence participation in payment for ecosystem services programs? An evaluation of Ecuador's SocioPáramo program (2014, background): “Particularly in the developing world, ocial goals are often an explicit component of PES design, with few rograms promoted as purely environmental initiatives (Landellills and Porras, 2002; McAfee and Shapiro, 2010; Farley et al., 011; Shapiro-Garza, 2013).”