Implicit and Explicit Attitudes: Examination of the Relationship between Measures of Intergroup Bias

208 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The rich—love them or hate them? Divergent implicit and explicit attitudes toward the wealthy (2017, background): “…Gawronski, Gschwendner, Le, & Schmitt, 2005) but may also diverge in valence, particularly in socially sensitive domains such as race (Fazio, Jackson, Dunton, & Williams, 1995; Greenwald, Poehlman, Uhlmann, & Banaji, 2009), reflecting a form of attitudinal ambivalence (Dovidio et al., 2001).”
Unraveling the Processes Underlying Evaluation: Attitudes from the Perspective of the Ape Model (2007, background): “As previously noted, the assumption that indirect measures provide access to highly robust evaluative representations (e.g., Dovidio et al., 2001; Petty et al., 2006; Rudman, 2004; Wilson et al., 2000) has been challenged by research, showing that evaluations assessed with indirect measures are…”
Implicit Attitudes and Discrimination Against People with Physical Disabilities (2011, unknown): “24) between explicit and implicit measures of prejudice (Dovidio et al., 2001; Greenwald et al., 2009; Hofmann, Gawronski, Geschwender, Le, & Schmitt, 2005).”
9 Perceiving Animacy and Intentionality: Visual Processing or Higher-Level Judgment? (2013, background): “And these cognitive processes may also conflict with explicit beliefs, as in the case of the operation of implicit stereotypes (e.g. Dovidio et al., 2001).”