Colonisation of kelp imitations by epiphyte and holdfast fauna; a study of mobility patterns
By K. Norderhaug, H. Christie, E. Rinde. 2002
116 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23667e59c405df3bd8f5287a16f6072d3892f105
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Oceanography
- H. Christie
- K. Norderhaug
- S. Fredriksen
- C. Wiencke
- Dan A. Smale
- Pippa J. Moore
- K. Bischof
- U. Karsten
Citations in the corpus
- Trophic importance of Laminaria hyperborea to kelp forest consumers and the importance of bacterial degradation to food quality (2003, background): “The fauna living on epiphytes are more mobile than the holdfast fauna (Norderhaug et al. 2002).”
- Bushy or smooth, high or low; importance of habitat architecture and vertical position for distribution of fauna on kelp (2007, background): “disperse to the mimics (Norderhaug et al., 2002); if a longer exposure period had been used, the mimics might have been influenced by drifting food particles that could interfere with testing of the effects of differences in architecture.”
- Expansive covers of turf-forming algae on human-dominated coast: the relative effects of increasing nutrient and sediment loads (2004, background): “Canopy-forming algae constitute some of the temperate world’s most extensive subtidal habitats (Dayton 1985; Goodsell et al. 2004) and their fragmentation and loss has major effects on the diversity of kelp-associated species (Goodsell and Connell 2002; Norderhaug et al. 2002 ).”
- The genus Laminaria sensu lato : recent insights and developments (2008, background): “…bryozoans, tube-building amphipods and gastropods (Schultze et al., 1990; Berman et al., 1992; Lambert et al., 1992; Okamura & Partridge 1999; Norderhaug et al., 2002; Christie et al., 2003), which are often attracted to settle on epiphytic turf algae that grow on kelps and provide suitable…”
- The role of kelp species as biogenic habitat formers in coastal marine ecosystems (2017, background): “A significant proportion of the holdfast fauna is highly mobile 157 and can quickly colonise new available habitat; exchanges between kelp plants and also from kelp to 158 surrounding habitat are thought to occur frequently (Norderhaug et al., 2002; Waage-Nielsen et al., 159 2003).”
- fish–macrofauna interactions in a kelp (laminaria hyperborea) forest (2005, background): “The observed di¡erences in vulnerability to predation between species living on epiphytes and holdfasts was probably because epiphyteassociated fauna are more mobile and therefore more exposed to predators than holdfast-associated fauna (Norderhaug et al., 2002).”
- Sea urchin grazing and kelp re-vegetation in the NE Atlantic (2009, background): “Large densities of mobile invertebrates, dominated by crustaceans and gastropods, are associated with the kelp (Norderhaug et al. 2002; Christie et al. 2003).”
- Macrophytes as habitat for fauna (2009, unknown): “6, see also Norderhaug et al. 2002, Waage-Nielsen et al. 2003) and during one night only, Jørgensen & Christie (2003) found an average of 21 species (SE = 0.8) and 178 (5.4) individuals dominated by amphipods and gastropods.”
- Effects of habitat complexity on the diversity and abundance of macrofauna colonising artificial kelp holdfasts (2006, methodology): “These 95 findings are consistent with a number of other studies (Norderhaug et al. 2002, Christie et al. 2003).”
- The future of seaweed aquaculture in a rapidly changing world (2017, background): “…Ik Kyo Chung ikchung@pusan.ac.kr; John Beardall john.beardall@monash.edu © 2017 British Phycological Society Fei, 2004) and nursery grounds (Norderhaug et al., 2002; O’Connor & Anderson, 2010); (3) Supporting, i.e. primary production (photosynthesis), nutrient cycling and biodiversity…”
- Species richness in macroalgae and macrofauna assemblages on Fucus serratus L. (Phaeophyceae) and Zostera marina L. (Angiospermae) in Skagerrak, Norway (2005, background): “…from other areas (see Coleman 1940; Meadows & Campbell 1972; Seed & O’Connor 1981; Edgar 1990; Schneider & Mann 1991; Knowles & Bell 1998), but our results agree better with the conclusion of Norderhaug et al. (2002), where some species showed specific preference and some were ubiquitous species.”