Species richness in macroalgae and macrofauna assemblages on Fucus serratus L. (Phaeophyceae) and Zostera marina L. (Angiospermae) in Skagerrak, Norway

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Infauna fromZostera marina L. meadows in Norway. Differences in vegetated and unvegetated areas (2010, background): “The above-ground vegetation provides habitats and substrates for free-living animals and epiphytic animals and algae (Neckles et al. 1993; Fredriksen & Christie 2003; Fredriksen et al. 2005).”
Macrophytes as habitat for fauna (2009, methodology): “Smaller kelps (Saccarina latissima) and fucoids were sampled individually, while turf algae and above-ground seagrasses were sampled by use of frames (20 × 20 or 50 × 50 cm, see Fredriksen et al. 2005).”
The ecology of rafting in the marine environment. III. Biogeographical and evolutionary consequences (2006, background): “Many species of these intermediate-sized algae are colonised by a diverse biota including mobile and sessile species (Mukai 1971, Norton & Benson 1983, Kitching 1987, Ingólfsson 1998, Fredriksen et al. 2005, Buschbaum et al. 2006).”
Large-scale shift from sugar kelp (Saccharina latissima) to ephemeral algae along the south and west coast of Norway (2012, background): “…ecosystem by providing a threedimensional shelter, feeding and nursery areas for many species (Christie et al. 2009) including fish, probably similar to observations of other large macrophytes (Gjøsæter 1987; Christie et al. 2003; Fredrik- sen 2003; Fredriksen et al. 2005; Norderhaug et al. 2005).”