Perfectionism, coping, and emotional adjustment.

By Kenneth G. Rice, D. Lapsley. 2001

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/234c853f0334ff193fcccef1ae965b1ec8fe8410

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Meifen Wei
2. Daniel W. Russell
3. D. O'Connor
4. R. O’Connor
5. M. Aldea
6. P. P. Heppner
7. S. Young
8. F. Dixon

Citations in the corpus

• Life Satisfaction, Happiness, and the Growth Mindset of Healthy and Unhealthy Perfectionists Among Hong Kong Chinese Gifted Students (2012, unknown): “…& Hanchon, 2004: Hawkins, Watt, & Sinclair, 2006; Parker, 1997; Parker & Mills, 1996; Parker, Portesova, & Stumpf, 2001; Rice & Dellwo, 2002; Rice & Lapsley, 2001; Rice & Mirzadeh, 2000; Schuler, 2000), and extended the classification results to gifted students of a broad age range in the…”
• An Empirical Typology of Perfectionism in Gifted Adolescents (2004, background): “…appears to be well attested, there has emerged a relatively new perspective asserting that perfectionism is a multidimensional construct with heterogeneous outcomes, some of which tend toward successful adaptation and positive adjustment (Blatt, 1995; Hewitt & Flett, 1991b; Rice & Lapsley, 2001).”
• Maladaptive perfectionism and ineffective coping as mediators between attachment and future depression: A prospective analysis. (2006, background): “Conversely, Rice and Lapsley (2001) failed to find that dysfunctional coping served as a mediator between perfectionism and emotional adjustment in a college student population.”
• Predicting hopelessness and psychological distress: The role of perfectionism and coping. (2003, background): “with Rice and Lapsley’s (2001) findings is not possible, as they did”
• The role of emotional dysregulation in perfectionism and psychological distress. (2006, background): “As Shrout and Bolger (2002) pointed out, suppression and mediation models are closely related and similarly analyzed; furthermore, when theoretically expected or substantial, total effects “must be interpreted with caution” (p. 432). As MacKinnon, Krull, and Lockwood (2000) noted, distinctions betwe”