Teasing apart the child care conundrum: A factorial survey analysis of perceptions of child care quality, fair market price and willingness to pay by low-income, African American parents

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Mothers' search for infant child care: the dynamic relationship between availability and desirability in a continental European welfare state (2008, methodology): “…care would indicate that access to services is more problematic for some ethnic minorities, such as African-American or Latino children in the United States (Brandon, 2004; Buysse, Castro, West & Skinner, 2005; Shlay et al., 2005), or Asian children in the United Kingdom (Barnes et al., 2005).”
Who We'll Live With: Neighborhood Racial Composition Preferences of Whites, Blacks and Latinos (2011, methodology): “Emerson et al. (2001) tested for independent racial preferences using a factorial experiment, a technique used to disentangle competing, related influences on an outcome (Durham 1986; Hunter and McClelland 1991; Rossi and Anderson 1982; Shlay et al. 2005).”
Child Care Choices of Low-Income Working Families. (2011, background): “Finding care can be especially problematic for low-income working families and families in which one or both parents work nonstandard hours (Henly and Lambert 2005; Presser 2003; Shlay et al. 2005; Snyder and Adelman 2004).”
The Application of Factorial Surveys in General Population Samples: The Effects of Respondent Age and Education on Response Times and Response Consistency (2011, methodology): “To the best of our knowledge, previous applications of FSs used numbers of dimensions ranging from three (Berk and Rossi 1977) up to 21 (Shlay et al. 2005).”