Impacts of Overlapping International Regimes: The Case of Biodiversity

By G. K. Rosendal. 2001

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Management of Technology and Innovation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22d2f3db66315fbf2ea937232141e9b390b818e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. J. Morin
2. F. Zelli
3. Harro van Asselt
4. J. Wettestad

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Philipp Pattberg
2. F. Zelli
3. Harro van Asselt
4. J. Wettestad

In Plant Science

1. Philipp Pattberg
2. F. Zelli
3. Harro van Asselt
4. J. Wettestad

Citations in the corpus

• The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis (2009, background): “…since only parties to an amendment can participate in the respective decision-making, the governance architecture on ozone depletion comes close to a sys-tem of ªve concentric circles, with the 1987 Montreal Protocol having the most parties, and each of the four amendments a more restrictive reach.”
• Regime Complexes: A Buzz, a Boom, or a Boost for Global Governance? (2013, background): “Several case studies have shown that what matters is neither the size of a complex nor the relations among its elements, but the conflictual or synergetic nature of its links.(10) The global trade regime complex, for example, became so synergetic that it evolved into a regime in its own right.”
• The Making of the 2003 EU Emissions Trading Directive: An Ultra-Quick Process due to Entrepreneurial Proficiency? (2005, background): “See, for example, Rosendal 2001; Stokke 2001; and Oberthur and Gehring 2003.”