The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis
By Frank Biermann, Philipp Pattberg, Harro van Asselt, F. Zelli. Global Environmental Politics, 2009
984 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Development, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85d3143f387711074580c137eadd1707b86edb91
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Development
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- Multiactor Governance and the Environment (2012, background): “This hybridization is explained as the result of two processes: First, the political and functional fragmentation of environmental regimes (142) and the growth of NSAs have resulted in opportunities for cross sector collaboration; second, international organizations have responded to the “pluralisat”
- Governing the design of national REDD+: an analysis of the power of agency (2014, background): “Governance-related questions in the literature concern the appropriateness of financial mechanisms, the allocation of and access to REDD+ benefits, the effectiveness of monitoring systems, and ‘good governance’ principles such as transparency, accountability and legitimacy (Brockhaus and Angelsen, 2”
- A Polycentric Approach to Global Climate Governance (2017, background): “This approach particularly focuses on horizontal differentiation at the international level (Biermann et al. 2009; Zelli and van Asselt 2013).”
- The Regime Complex for Climate Change (2011, neutral): “For an additional perspective on the causes of integration or fragmentation, with application to climate change, see Biermann et al. 2009.”
- Mapping the Trade and Environment Nexus: Insights from a New Data Set (2018, background): “Other influential databases have recently documented the contribution of city networks and transnational partnerships in global environmental governance (e.g., Bulkeley and Betsill 2005; Andonova et al. 2009; Biermann et al. 2009; Green 2013; Abbott 2012).”
- The Emergent Network Structure of the Multilateral Environmental Agreement System (2013, background): “…has received significant scholarly attention as a macroscopic feature of international environmental law and governance (e.g., Doelle, 2004; Stephens, 2007; Carlarne, 2008; van Asselt et al., 2008; Biermann et al., 2009; Boyd, 2010; Scott, 2011; van Asselt, 2012; Zelli and van Asselt, 2013).”