The Usability Metric for User Experience
By Kraig A. Finstad. Interacting with computers, 2010
633 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Human-Computer Interaction
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22a33b51de3936f11c6f572579f157e4b1c40c06
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Samar Rahi
- Prokopia Vlachogianni
- James R. Lewis
- Vajirasak Vanijja
- Brian S. Utesch
- Deborah E. Maher
- Nikolaos Tselios
- Debajyoti Pal
In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
- Samar Rahi
- Prokopia Vlachogianni
- James R. Lewis
- Vajirasak Vanijja
- Brian S. Utesch
- Deborah E. Maher
- Nikolaos Tselios
- Debajyoti Pal
In Human-Computer Interaction
- James R. Lewis
- Vajirasak Vanijja
- Debajyoti Pal
- Prokopia Vlachogianni
- Nikolaos Tselios
- Brian S. Utesch
- Deborah E. Maher
- Samar Rahi
Citations in the corpus
- Perceived usability evaluation of Microsoft Teams as an online learning platform during COVID-19 using system usability scale and technology acceptance model in India (2020, methodology): “Moreover, for explaining the usage of any system, product or technology, researchers have used either the concepts of perceived usability (by using SUS, UMUX, etc.) or PEOU and PU (by using TAM or other theoretical models) in a mutually exclusive manner, making the efforts to usability evaluation ra”
- Research Design and Methods: A Systematic Review of Research Paradigms, Sampling Issues and Instruments Development (2018, background): “Seven-point Likert scale appears to be more suited in electronic survey [37].”
- Usability: Lessons Learned … and Yet to Be Learned (2014, neutral): “Finstad (2010, 2013) created the UMUX to address that need.”
- UMUX-LITE: when there's no time for the SUS (2013, methodology): “We set out to see if an independent assessment of the UMUX would lead to the same results as the original research that produced the UMUX [6].”
- Perceived usability evaluation of educational technology using the System Usability Scale (SUS): A systematic review (2021, background): “…and validity are confirmed by the literature, with Cronbach ’ s alpha found repeatedly greater than 0.80 and in most of the research papers even above 0.90 (Chu et al., 2019; Bangor et al., 2008; Orfanou et al., 2015; Pal & Vanijja, 2020; Amariei, 2020; Kortum et al., 2020; Finstad, 2010).”
- The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future (2018, methodology): “Since Finstad (2010) published his measure of perceived usability, the UMUX, and found it to correspond closely to concurrently collected SUS scores, several other researchers have published similar findings with the UMUX, UMUX-LITE, UMUX-LITEr, and CSUQ.”