Rural tourism in Spain: an analysis of recent evolution

By G. Cánoves, Montserrat Villarino, G. K. Priestley, Asunción Blanco. 2004

332 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/227984fd25d40f2691b8fc61e957a9021f02ce71

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. C. Iatu
2. B. Ibănescu
3. R. Buckley
4. Alina Munteanu
5. Oana Mihaela Stoleriu

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. Claudia Ollenburg
2. R. Buckley
3. Carla Barbieri

In Sociology and Political Science

1. C. Iatu
2. B. Ibănescu
3. R. Buckley
4. Ana Isabel Polo Peña
5. Alina Munteanu
6. Dolores María Frías Jamilena
7. Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Molina
8. Oana Mihaela Stoleriu

Citations in the corpus

• The perceived value of the rural tourism stay and its effect on rural tourist behaviour (2012, background): “In most industrialised countries, RT is becoming an important tool for the economic and social regeneration of outlying rural zones (Canoves, Villarino, Priestley, & Blanco, 2004 ; Gannon, 1994 ).”
• The Impact of Tourism on Sustainable Development of Rural Areas: Evidence from Romania (2018, background): “Thus, it is not surprising that national and local actors around the globe promoted tourism policies and strategies in order to revitalize the suffering rural areas [33–36], rural tourism being perceived as a sustainable ‘cure-all’ solution for many issues of rural economies [35].”
• Stated Economic and Social Motivations of Farm Tourism Operators (2007, background): “Farm tourism means commercial tourism enterprises on working farms (Busby and Rendle 2000; Canoves et al., 2004; Clarke 1996; Frater 1983; Weaver and Fennell 1997).”