Fifth generation distance education
By James C. Taylor. 2001
356 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/226f6e90a954d3266db1b78ab7cd54a3c23a0179
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- S. Walker
- B. Fraser
- Marianne Baki
- Robert F. Murphy
- Yukie Toyama
- B. Means
- Jill M. Aldridge
- Yan Huay Chionh
Citations in the corpus
- How Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2004, unknown): “To this, Taylor (2001) adds the “fourth generation,” characterized by flexible learning (e.g., CMC, Internet-accessible courses), and the “fifth generation” (e.g., online interactive multimedia, Internet-based access to Web resources).”
- The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2013, background): “Online learning has been described as a “fifth generation” version of distance education “designed to capitalize on the features of the Internet and the Web” (Taylor, 2001, p. 2).”
- Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing Distance Education Learning Environments in Higher Education: The Distance Education Learning Environments Survey (DELES) (2005, background): “Fifth-generation distance education, which is defined by the convergence of telecommunications and computing technologies available today (Taylor, 2001), has come to a point where higher education chances falling prey to “the commoditization of the educational function of the university, transformin”