And deplete us not into temptation: Automatic attitudes, dietary restraint, and self-regulatory resources as determinants of eating behavior

By Wilhelm Hofmann, Wolfgang A. Rauch, Bertram Gawronski. 2007

527 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/223e50ef15498694fe7c1cc3fb047968cd5075e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Literature and Literary Theory

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Ten Frequently Asked Questions About Implicit Measures and Their Frequently Supposed, But Not Entirely Correct Answers (2009, result): “In line with these findings, implicit measures have also been shown to be superior over self-report measures in predicting behavior under conditions of reduced cognitive capacity (e.g., Hofmann, Gschwendner, Castelli, & Schmitt, 2008; Hofmann, Rauch, & Gawronski, 2007 ).”
Three ways to resist temptation: The independent contributions of executive attention, inhibitory control, and affect regulation to the impulse control of eating behavior (2009, methodology): “Following previous reasoning, impulse control was indicated by the degree to which these three factors reduce the influence of automatic affective reactions toward candy on actual behavior (Hofmann et al., in press; Hofmann et al., 2007).”
The strength model of self-regulation failure and health-related behaviour (2009, background): “…relevant from a health point of view, self-regulatory resource depletion has been shown to lead to reduced restraint when it comes to eating tempting foods in ostensible food-tasting tests (Hofmann et al., 2007; Kahan et al., 2003; Vohs & Heatherton, 2000; Zyphur, Warren, Landis, & Thoresen, 2007).”
Impulsive versus reflective influences on health behavior: a theoretical framework and empirical review (2008, methodology): “In a first test of these predictions (Hofmann, Rauch, & Gawronski, 2007 ), candy consumption in a test and rate task was primarily predicted by automatic affective reactions as measured with a Single Category-IAT (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006 ) for participants who were depleted of self-regu”
When and why do implicit measures predict behaviour? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance (2008, methodology): “A study by Hofmann et al. (2007) used a similar procedure when predicting candy instead of potato chip consumption.”
Will the Real Moral Judgment Please Stand Up? (2009, background): “... of both motivation and available cognitive resources in overcoming unwanted automatic influence, the prejudice control literature often finds that automatic social attitudes have a greater influence when behaviours or judgments are made spontaneously (e.g., Dovidio et al. 1997; Rydell and McConn”
Perils of Compensatory Consumption: Within-Domain Compensation Undermines Subsequent Self-Regulation (2015, methodology): “Because only people who like eating chocolate candy require self-control to restrain their consumption (Hofmann et al. 2007), we measured how much each person liked eating the chocolate candies in general.”