Will the Real Moral Judgment Please Stand Up?

By J. Kennett, C. Fine. 2009

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/18af9f90889812c8d4ee9b8970c69084e9abdb22

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Leland F. Saunders
2. Brian K. Payne
3. Bertram Gawronski
4. Galen Bodenhausen
5. J. de Houwer
6. R. Sritharan

In Social Psychology

1. Bertram Gawronski
2. Brian K. Payne
3. Leland F. Saunders
4. Galen Bodenhausen
5. Nilanjana Dasgupta
6. J. de Houwer
7. R. Sritharan
8. Laura A. Creighton

Citations in the corpus

• What is moral reasoning? (2015, background): “…are independent pathways for arriving at a moral judgment (Greene, 2008; Greene, et al., 2001), and still others argue that the data are wholly consistent with the claim that moral judgments are all products of moral reasoning (Fine, 2006; Horgan & Timmons, 2007; Jones, 2003; Kennett & Fine, 2009).”
• A History of Implicit Social Cognition Where Is It Coming From? Where Is It Now? Where Is It Going? (2010, background): “Contemporary philosophers have recently begun integrating insights from implicit social cognition with theories of ethics, creating an exciting exchange of ideas across disciplines (e.g., Appiah, 2008; Doris, 2002; Kennett & Fine, 2009).”