Beauty, gender and stereotypes : Evidence from laboratory experiments
By James Andreoni, Ragan Petrie. 2008
332 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2119d54499a477808a9549119da7d79520e61c61
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- Salvatore Ruggieri
- Rachel T. A. Croson
- Uri Gneezy
- Andrea Romei
- Simon Gächter
- Ernst Fehr
- John A. List
- Dirk Sliwka
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Alexander Todorov
- Ralph Adolphs
- Christopher Y. Olivola
- Ron Dotsch
- Nikolaas N. Oosterhof
- Peter Mende-Siedlecki
- M. Petersen
- Lasse Laustsen
In Safety Research
- Uri Gneezy
- Rachel T. A. Croson
- Andrea Romei
- Salvatore Ruggieri
- Simon Gächter
- John A. List
- Ernst Fehr
- Gary Charness
Citations in the corpus
- The Looks of a Winner: Beauty, Gender and Electoral Success (2006, unknown): “Andreoni and Petri (2004) and Mobius and Rosenblat (2006).2 We take this line of inquiry further and ask whether there are benefits to being beautiful in the political arena as well.”
- Gender Differences in Preferences (2009, background): “Finally, Sell, Griffith and Wilson (1993), Cadsby and Maynes (1998), and Andreoni and Petrie (2007) find no significant differences.”
- Lab Labor: What can Labor Economists Learn from the Lab? (2010, unknown): “79 Andreoni and Petrie (2008) study the beauty premium in a public-goods game.”
- A multidisciplinary survey on discrimination analysis (2013, background): “Andreoni and Petrie (2008) run different experiments in which the employer player is or is not given information on the skills of”
- Predicting Election Outcomes from Positive and Negative Trait Assessments of Candidate Images (2010, background): “Examples include studies of court verdicts (Piehl, 1977; Sigall & Ostrove, 1975; Thornton, 1977) and studies of the beauty penalty when building trust or setting performance expectations (Andreoni & Petrie, 2008; Solnick & Schweitzer, 1999; Wilson & Eckel, 2006).”
- Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma (2018, unknown): “Cooperation rates increase with the involve repetitions of finitely repeated linear VCMs (with rematching between each supergame); these are Andreoni & Petrie (2004, 2008), Muller et al. (2008), and Lugovskyy et al. (2017).”