Covariance versus component-based estimations of performance in green supply chain management

246 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The impact of external pressure and sustainable management practices on manufacturing performance and environmental outcomes (2016, background): “From the point of view of economic performance, there has been a lack of consensus about whether green practices lead to improved economic performance (Green et al., 2012; Zailani et al., 2012) or otherwise (De Giovanni and Vinzi, 2012; Huang et al., 2012).”
Institutional Pressures, Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Environmental and Economic Performance: A Two Theory View (2018, background): “While most of the studies could not find any significant effect or found only negative results [43,82,106,107], few have also found positive results [8,76,108].”
Trade-in and save: A two-period closed-loop supply chain game with price and technology dependent returns (2017, unknown): “max p1,p2 ΠR = q1(p1 − ωA1) } {{ } R′s Forward pro t in t1 + δq2(p2 − ωA2) } {{ } R′s Forward pro t in t2 + δrq1νgA1 } {{ } R′s Backward pro t in t2 (10)”
Green supply chain management practices and performance (2013, background): “(2012) found positive relationships between environmental practices and organizational performance, other studies such as Giovanni and Vinzi (2012) and Huang et al.”