Learning to Think Things Through: A Guide to Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum

By Gerald M. Nosich. 2000

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A critical genre based approach to teaching academic writing in a tertiary EFL context in Indonesia. (2005, methodology): “…of generalized abilities and dispositions which can be utilized or applied across a variety of situations and circumstances (see Norris, 1992; Ennis, 1992; Paul, 2002: Nosich, 2001; Reichenbach, 2001; Siegel, 1988, 1997) and that CT transfers to other domains of knowledge (Halpern, 2003, p. 360).”
Novel Program to Promote Critical Thinking among Higher Education Students: Empirical Study from Saudi Arabia (2012, background): “While Ennis (2001) roughly defines it as reasonable and reflective thinking that is focused on deciding what to believe or do, Nosich (2009) sees it as more than making such decisions; it is a metacognitive, reasonable, and authentic process that involves high standards and such concerns as…”
Assessment Techniques and Students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills (2016, background): “Nosich (2012) stated that critical thinking consists several pertinent types; being reflective, involving standards, being authentic, and being reasonable.”