Developing a framework for ethically questionable behaviour in consumption.

By Kyoko Fukukawa. 2002

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/205d61e0425f1547b640aaa6b5bc272403f3b070

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Consumer Social Responsibility (CnSR): Toward a Multi-Level, Multi-Agent Conceptualization of the “Other CSR” (2013, unknown): “The applicability of such models has been supported in settings that range from consumers’ purchase of Fair Trade products (e.g., Shaw and Clarke 1999; Shaw et al. 2000) to consumer misconduct and illegal transgressions (e.g., Fukukawa 2002; Vitell et al. 2001).”
Virtue in Consumption? (2004, background): “A further construct of “perceived unfairness” has been proposed by Fukukawa (2002) following an empirical test of the TPB in the context of consumer ethics.”
Dysfunctional Customer Behavior Severity: An Empirical Examination (2009, background): “Typically, existing studies are framed within a specific academy, including sociology (Rosenbaum and Kuntze 2003), psychology (Al-Rafee and Cronan 2006), and business ethics (Fukukawa 2002).”
Online consumer misbehaviour: an application of neutralization theory (2009, background): “Many studies have found that piracy was not necessarily regarded as illegal or unethical (Vitell and Muncy, 1992; Logsdon et al., 1994; Simpson et al., 1994; Glass and Wood, 1996; Cheng et al., 1997; Kearns, 2001; Fukukawa, 2002; Cronan and Al-Rafee, 2008).”
Whistleblowing as Planned Behavior – A Survey of South Korean Police Officers (2009, methodology): “Fukukawa (2002) applied TPB to a consumer's ethically questionable behavior in order to explain its complexity, and Bobek and Hatfield (2003) employed the theory as a theoretical framework for exploring taxpayers' intentions to comply with tax laws.”