Yours, Mine, and Ours: Do Divorce Laws Affect the Intertemporal Behavior of Married Couples?

By Alessandra Voena. 2015

304 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Demography, Gender Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2032c5ed658eabfdfbab245b7114cb1902e8e680

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Ken Yamada
2. Jeremy Lise

In Demography

1. Ken Yamada
2. Jeremy Lise

In Gender Studies

1. Ken Yamada
2. Jeremy Lise

Citations in the corpus

• Household Sharing and Commitment: Evidence from Panel Data on Individual Expenditures and Time Use (2014, background): “Potential candidates for this value include the value of divorce (Mazzocco, Ruiz, and Yamaguchi, 2013; Voena, 2015) or the value associated with non-cooperative interactions within the household (Lundberg and Pollak, 1993; Del Boca and Flinn, 2012).”
• Measuring and Changing Control: Women's Empowerment and Targeted Transfers (2016, unknown): “these models to study household decision-making in a variety of specific contexts, such as the allocation of resources to children, labour supply, and fertility decisions (Hoddinott and Haddad, 1995; Chiappori et al., 2002; Blundell et al., 2005, 2007; Ashraf et al., 2014; Voena, 2015).”
• Why Are Older Women Missing in India? The Age Profile of Bargaining Power and Poverty (2020, unknown): “More broadly, a promising avenue for future research is the investigation of Indian women’s bargaining power using an intertemporal model, in which household members cannot commit to the future allocation of resources (Mazzocco 2007; Mazzocco, Ruiz, and Yamaguchi 2014; Voena 2015).”
• The Marriage Market, Labor Supply, and Education Choice (2015, unknown): “lnwit = lnW (θi, s, g) + δ gs 1 ti + δ gs 2 t 2 i + δ gs 3 t 3 i + eit + it (31)”
• Divorce Risk, Wages and Working Wives: A Quantitative Life‐Cycle Analysis of Female Labour Force Participation (2014, unknown): “A recent paper by Voena (2012), using variations in savings behaviour and divorce laws, estimates a value of 0.”