Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. David J. Townsend and Thomas G. Bever. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001. Pp. 455.
By N. Chipere. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2002
285 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Philosophy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/202d9069da205ce0980ab12f4ab23798714aceb7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Philosophy
- Fernanda Ferreira
- Harald Clahsen
- Claudia Felser
- Matthias Schlesewsky
- Michael Karg
- Nikole D. Patson
- Alexandra Kirsch
- Julie A. Van Dyke
Citations in the corpus
- Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. (2007, background): “One possibility stems from the coordination between a “fast and frugal” heuristic system with the output of more rigorous syntactic algorithms, as recently proposed by a number of researchers ( Bever & Townsend, 2001; Ferreira, 2003).”
- The 'Good Enough' Approach to Language Comprehension (2007, background): “Instead, it appears that comprehenders of English have a heuristic for understanding basic declarative sentences: They assume that the first noun phrase (NP) is the agent of the action, and the next NP is the entity affected by the action (Bever 1970; Townsend & Bever 2001).”
- Reverse Island Effects and the Backward Search for a Licensor in Multiple Wh-Questions (2011, background): “Second, much recent research on real-time sentence processing has revealed specific scenarios in which the parser does not follow syntactic rules strictly, at least not initially (Townsend & Bever 2001; Ferreira, Ferraro & Bailey 2002; Ferreira & Patson 2007; Phillips, Wagers & Lau 2011).”
- Processing reflexives in a second language: The timing of structural and discourse-level constraints (2011, background): “…with processing models that assume the existence of multiple processing pathways potentially operating in parallel (e.g., Ferreira, Bailey, & Ferraro, 2002; Townsend & Bever, 2001), and the hypothesis that structural processing is compromised in nonnative comprehension (Clahsen & Felser, 2006).”
- Simultaneous Plan Recognition and Monitoring (SPRAM) for Robot Assistants (2013, background): “[17] found that humans tend to pattern daily actions into sequences which they repeat at particular times in particular places.”
- Continuity and shallow structures in language processing (2006, methodology): “Contrary to Townsend and Bever (2001), we do not assume, for example, that the initial semantic analysis (or shallow processing, in our terms) normally precedes full parsing.”
- Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension (2005, background): “For example, while a position-based assignment of participant roles (bActor-before-UndergoerQ in active and bUndergoer-before-ActorQ in passive structures) yields success in the vast majority of English sentences (Townsend and Bever, 2001), languages such as German, Russian and Japanese rely less he”