Choosing reputable servents in a P2P network

By Fabrizio Cornelli, Ernesto Damiani, Sabrina De Capitani di Vimercati, Stefano Paraboschi, Pierangela Samarati. The Web Conference, 2002

449 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1fa63cc050ee007bcad114bc251adf8380ec59b8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Computer Networks and Communications

In Information Systems

Citations in the corpus

TrustGuard: countering vulnerabilities in reputation management for decentralized overlay networks (2005, background): “…in Reputation Management for Decentralized Overlay Networks Mudhakar Srivatsa, Li Xiong, Ling Liu College of Computing Georgia Institute of Technology {mudhakar, lxiong, lingliu}@cc.gatech.edu ABSTRACT Reputation systems have been popular in estimating the trustworthiness and…”
Taxonomy of trust: Categorizing P2P reputation systems (2006, background): “) Asking a small number of peers limits the communication overhead on the network [20], while asking a larger number improves the chances of collecting useful information on a specific peer [32].”
QoS-Based Service Selection and Ranking with Trust and Reputation Management (2005, methodology): “Other ideas of the trust and reputation management method are based on [19–21].”
On Death, Taxes, and the Convergence of Peer-to-Peer and Grid Computing (2003, background): “…has revealed the need for new services, such as anonymity and censorship resistance [48], incentives for fair sharing and reputation management [14], and result checking [45]—important issues that have not tended to arise to date in Grid computing due to different underlying trust assumptions.”
A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision (2007, methodology): “[13] have described a reputation scheme to be used on top of the Gnutella(26) P2P network.”
A survey of trust in computer science and the Semantic Web (2007, methodology): “, 2002) [48] (Aberer and Despotovic, 2001) [49] (Damiani et al.”
Filtering Out Unfair Ratings in Bayesian Reputation Systems (2004, unknown): “(2002) [3], Ekström & Björnson (2002) [5] and Yu & Singh (2003) [14].”
PeerTrust: supporting reputation-based trust for peer-to-peer electronic communities (2004, background): “[9] is a P2P protocol where servants can keep track of information about the reputation of other peers and share them with others.”
EigenRep: Reputation Management in P2P Networks (2003, background): “Previous work in P2P reputation systems [2] [1] has all been based on similar notions of local reputation values.”
TrustMe: anonymous management of trust relationships in decentralized P2P systems (2003, background): “Most of the trust based P2P systems [4, 8] have sacrificed anonymity in order to provide secure underlying protocols.”