TrustGuard: countering vulnerabilities in reputation management for decentralized overlay networks
By Mudhakar Srivatsa, Li Xiong, Ling Liu. The Web Conference, 2005
360 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7bbfd9ba855e395740a0113b423f999874ff4ff0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Computer Networks and Communications
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- A survey of attack and defense techniques for reputation systems (2009, methodology): “TrustGuard While electronic reputation systems have been proposed as an ef.cient and effective way to minimize the impact of sel.sh and malicious nodes on peer-to-peer systems, the reputation systems themselves are often ill protected, containing ad hoc protection mechanisms against a small set o”
- PowerTrust: A Robust and Scalable Reputation System for Trusted Peer-to-Peer Computing (2007, background): “Instead, most existing P2P reputation systems calculate the global reputation scores by aggregating peer feedbacks in a fully distributed manner [1], [3], [6], [13], [15], [26], [29], [30], [34], [36].”