Taxonomy of trust: Categorizing P2P reputation systems
By Sergio Angel Marti, Hector Garcia-Molina. Comput. Networks, 2006
498 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d09d954b61003ea740d2d8a8894e2f33ffb45725
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Shanshan Song
- Kai W. Hwang
- Yu-Kwong Kwok
- Carlos Castillo
- Runfang Zhou
- Max Mühlhäuser
- Brian D. Davison
- Shankar Karuppayah
In Information Systems
- Shanshan Song
- Kai W. Hwang
- Yu-Kwong Kwok
- Carlos Castillo
- Runfang Zhou
- Max Mühlhäuser
- Brian D. Davison
- Shankar Karuppayah
In Sociology and Political Science
- Shanshan Song
- Kai W. Hwang
- Yu-Kwong Kwok
- Carlos Castillo
- Runfang Zhou
- Max Mühlhäuser
- Brian D. Davison
- Shankar Karuppayah
Citations in the corpus
- Taxonomy and Survey of Collaborative Intrusion Detection (2015, methodology): “ACM Computing Surveys, Vol Taxonomy and Survey of Collaborative Intrusion Detection 55:7 A generic countermeasure against malicious insiders in distributed systems is the adoption of reputation systems [Resnick et al. 2000; Marti and Garcia-Molina 2006], such as EigenTrust [Kamvar et al. 2003].”
- Adversarial Web Search (2011, background): “A taxonomy of P2P reputation systems is introduced by Marti and Garcia-Molina [158]; this taxonomy considers factors such as”
- Trusted P2P transactions with fuzzy reputation aggregation (2005, methodology): “Figure A. Fuzzy membership functions and the fuzzy reputation aggregation procedure.We show ( 1 ) the high membership function of a local score (T), (2) the five levels of membership functions of T, and (3) the application of two rules to induce the seller’s local score.”